Now the problem I see is that every review of those games is in. Marasmusine 13:27, 15 October 2007 (UTC) Reply Thank your for the info :) I'm understanding why this is done. The primary source (the game and official website) can be used as a reference when notability is established. This may be magazine reviews, interviews with the developers, or what have you. ![]() contribs) 07:40, 15 October 2007 (UTC) Reply WP:N requires that independent references be used to assert notability.And I don't know why this page is bad, I just copied the most from PySol -Preceding unsigned comment added by Panreyes ( talk I understand that the PiX Juegos page was not needed, but "the reliable sources" are just the page that is referenced in External links. Marasmusine 07:18, 15 October 2007 (UTC) Reply Why have you deleted the features section in every game? If you are involved in the making or publication of the games yourself, you might want to take a look at WP:COI too. Panreyes 00:54, 15 October 2007 (UTC) Reply Those articles won't necessarily last long unless you can show how they are notable and provide reliable, independent sources for them, see WP:N and WP:V. I'm not english-speaker myself, and I cannot write an entire article in english for it.Īnd, last, if anyone is not completely sure, our games are 100% GPL, the source is included along the binaries and there's a copy of the GPL in every project's page and within the binaries. ![]() To anyone who doesn't understand why I'm saying this, it's because our games have been deleted from this list some times before by people who consider theirselves that "games without article should be deleted". If anyone removes our games from this list, please give a good reason. By PiX Juegos' games I mean: PiX Bros, PiX Pang and PiX Frogger
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |